...
- The user stories are large and comprised of many independent and dependent pieces of value
- The active sprint shows that each user story is linked to a feature and most of them are assigned to a version
- Each story is also assigned to a team member and is estimated in story point. There are stories with the size "0". It would be important to understand why or the rationale behind it
- Acceptance criteria read as tasks and include inter-team collaboration (IPHCD-2855)
- Notes and tasks are referenced that are not included as a user story (IPHCD-2855)
- Value statements missing for some stories (IPHCD-2808)
- Value statements juxtapose internal and /external users and value statementinternal/external value (IPHCD-2855)
- Acceptance criteria are broad and not binary (IPHCD-2791)
- Story titles are vague at times. This could be due to:
- The LACE not knowing your work well
- The scope of the stories is too large