LACE (CCSQ Lean Agile Center of Excellence)

Page tree

Versions Compared

Old Version 10

changes.mady.by.user Louis Fouejieu

Saved on

compared with

New Version 11

changes.mady.by.user Marc Santini

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • The user stories are large and comprised of many independent and dependent pieces of value. Multiple stories should be able to completed in a 
  • The active sprint shows that each user story is linked to a feature and most of them are assigned to a version.
  • Each story is also assigned to a team member and is estimated in story point. There are stories with the size "0". It would be important to understand why or the rationale behind it.
  • Acceptance criteria read as tasks and include inter-team collaboration
  • Notes and tasks are referenced that are not included as a user story
  • Value statements missing juxtapose internal and external users and value statement
  • Acceptance criteria are broad and not binary
  • Story titles are vague at times. This could be due to:
    • The LACE not knowing your work well
    • The scope of the stories is too large